Answer: Ok now tell me, is this doubt pertaining to a non-perception? Or is it pertaining to a perception? If it is the first case, then it is a contradiction (how can you doubt that which is a non-perception?) If it is the second case, then it is a logical fallacy such as self reference (chicken first or egg first) or cyclicality (seed -> sprout -> tree -> fruit -> seed) etc. Both perception and non-perception as you are stating them are logical concepts alone.
Anything pertaining to transactional reality will have all these logical fallacies. In that transactional plane, if we conceive some intellectual idea of non-perception, it will always be a concept. Move towards the subject.
Anything pertaining to transactional reality will have all these logical fallacies. In that transactional plane, if we conceive some intellectual idea of non-perception, it will always be a concept. Move towards the subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment